Log in

legislative alerts

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • Friday, November 26, 2021 3:10 PM | Donna Rodill (Administrator)

    Reconciliation and Recoupment Plans for Estimated Claims Payment Period for United Health Group (UHG) / Optum Behavioral Health Providers (Optum)

    The Maryland Department of Health (MDH) is preparing to enter into the next phase of reconciliation to resolve the differences in the estimated claims paid from January 1, 2020 through August, 3, 2020, with actual claims submitted for those dates of service.

    In contrast to the initial rollout, the UHG/Optum Maryland system has improved dramatically – additional enhancements continue to be made to ensure that providers are accurately and promptly paid for all services provided, and the vast majority of providers are successfully submitting authorizations and claims and are getting paid for the vital services they provide.

    UHG/Optum has so far received nearly 17 million claims between January 2020 through August 2021 and has successfully paid nearly $2.9 billion associated with those claims to over 2,600 providers who participate in the Public Behavioral Health System. UHG /Optum is currently paying out an average of $30-$40 million a week to providers based on actual claims for care.

    Overall, 98 percent of all provider claims are being adjudicated within 14 days – numbers that are consistent with the experience with the old payment system and are within industry standards.

    Beginning on October 24, 2021, MDH anticipates that all of the remaining 835 and Provider Remittance Advice (PRA) reports required for providers to complete any internal reconciliation needed between actual claims submitted and payments from the estimated claims payment period will have been delivered.

    The state has a legal and moral responsibility to Maryland taxpayers to recoup these funds, and the time has come to enact a repayment plan that both recognizes this responsibility while making the appropriate allowances to providers. With that in mind, we do not plan to initiate formal recoupment of balances owed until providers have had a reasonable amount of time to reconcile their internal accounting. We estimate that recoupment will begin on or around December 1, 2021.

    Moving Forward on Reconciliation

    Currently, providers have received approximately $237 million in excess payments during this process, which some have already repaid and many others are working to repay.

    In recognition of the challenge caused by repayment, MDH will be forgiving the debt for eligible providers owing $10,000 or less. As a result, more than 42 percent of providers with outstanding balances due will owe nothing. Hopefully, this will eliminate the burden on small, community-based providers. All providers owing $10,000 or less will have their balances cleared with the exception of the following provider types:

    1. Hospitals

    2. Laboratories

    3. Somatic BH Health Providers

    4. Out-of-state providers

    5. Providers who have not yet submitted claims against any of the estimated claims paid.

    This plan will have repayment options for those providers owing more than $10,000. They will have one of three options for repayment:

    1. Payment in full at time of notice.

    2. A12-month,interest-freerepaymentplan.

    3. The option to credit current claims paid to off set all or some of the balance sowed over a 12-month period, with final payment to be completed within twelve months.

    For providers with outstanding or fully paid balances of between $10,001 and $50,000, we will engage the provider community and will evaluate providing additional relief.

    We value our relationship with the Behavioral Health Community and are thankful for the critical services you have continued to provide during this challenging time for all Marylanders in need, especially our most vulnerable populations.

    For additional questions please go here:

  • Monday, October 25, 2021 3:48 PM | Donna Rodill (Administrator)

    October 25, 2021

    Nicki Drotleff, LCMFT
    Board of Professional Counselors
    4201 Patterson Avenue, Suite 316
    Baltimore, Maryland 21215-2299

    Dear Ms. Drotleff:

    The Licensed Clinical Professional Counselors of Maryland appreciates the telehealth flexibility extended to health care practitioners during the Governor’s state of emergency.   Governor Hogan, the Maryland Department of Health, and the Board of Professional Counselors and Therapists are to be commended for ensuring that Marylanders continued to receive behavioral health services in these difficult times.

    Since the State public health emergency has ended, we are reviewing existing regulations and requirements in regards to telehealth practice.   We have identified several provisions under COMAR 10.58.06 that are not consistent with the teletherapy laws recently enacted. Since teletherapy has become a primary mode of providing treatment to clients, our members need to be clear about when they are at risk of disciplinary action regarding how they provide teletherapy services. We are asking the Board to offer LCPCs guidance regarding the following:

    • Location of the Practitioner:  Under, the regulations state that telehealth requirements apply if either the Maryland licensed practitioner or client is located in Maryland.  However, Maryland’s law is structured differently.  Under Health Occupations Article §1-1005, Maryland’s telehealth law applies to only when the patient is located in Maryland.  We understand when patients are located in another state and the practitioner is in Maryland, the telehealth laws of the patient’s state apply; otherwise, a practitioner could be subject to two conflicting standards.  We would appreciate clarification on the issue;

    • Audio-Only:  While Health Occupations Article §1-1001 did not include audio-only in the definition of telehealth, it is our understanding that the law still permits practitioners to provide services to patients through audio-only communications.  Those communications are not required to be regulated in the same manner as telehealth services, although a Board could choose to impose similar requirements just as long as those requirements were not inconsistent with the law.

      This past session, the Maryland General Assembly clarified its intent that the Maryland Medicaid Program and State-regulated private insurers reimburse for somatic, behavioral health, and somatic care services delivered through audio-only technology.House Bill 123/Senate 3 is clear that the Maryland General Assembly’s intent is that audio-only services be permitted for behavioral health services.

      We ask that the Board communicate with its licensees that audio-only services are permitted through regulation or guidance.  Many licensees are confused, especially with all changes in telehealth policies under the state and federal public health emergencies.

    • Asynchronous Technology:  Under Health Occupations Article §1-1002, practitioners are permitted to establish patient relationships using either synchronous or asynchronous technology.  The Board’s regulations conflict with statute if COMAR is intended to specify that a practitioner must perform a patient evaluation using synchronous technology before establishing a patient relationship.  We would appreciate a clarification of the Board’s intent.

    Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments to the Board.  If we can be helpful in any other way, please contact our legislative representative, Robyn Elliott, at relliott@policypartners.net

    Susan Roistacher, LCPC

  • Friday, October 01, 2021 3:19 PM | Donna Rodill (Administrator)

    New Minor Consent Law for Mental Health Services in Maryland (Senate Bill 41 - The Mental Health Access Initiative)

    LCPCM supported and testified on behalf of Senate Bill 41, which lowers the age of consent from 16 to 12 years of age for those seeking mental health treatment. A child in Maryland may now seek and receive treatment without parental consent in the same capacity as an adult, if the licensed provider has determined that the child is mature and capable of giving informed consent. It is within the professional discretion of the treatment provider to decide if, when, and how to inform parents, unless the provider believes that the disclosure will lead to harm to the minor. This law went into effect on October 1, 2021.

    Of course, the goal of all good child psychotherapy is to involve the parents and family, but this new law gives a licensed provider the opportunity to assess the mental health concern of a youth in crisis and in other serious situations. There are two caveats, however: (1) the new law does not apply to medication-based treatment, and (2) when a minor 12-15 offers consent, insurance claims cannot be made without parental permission and the parent is not liable for the treatment fees. 

    The law is intended to remove unreasonable barriers to mental health services for youth with suicidal ideation and other critical circumstances. Additionally, this law is intended to support special subpopulations of youth, such as those in the LGBTQIA+ community and those needing emergency attention from Mobile Crisis Teams in circumstances where a parent cannot be reached or refuses consent. 

    You can access the text of SB 41 on the Maryland General Assembly website. You can also view the School Based Health Care's Webinar on the new minor consent law by clicking on the following link: https://vimeo.com/620126737

  • Friday, April 03, 2020 8:05 PM | Anonymous

    The list below highlights bills passed by the Maryland General Assembly during the 2020 Legislative Session which was cut short due to the current health crisis.  As of this posting date, all bills are currently awaiting the Governor’s signature before becoming law, with the exception of HB 1663/SB 1080, which Governor Hogan signed on March 19, 2020. Due to the current health crisis, the Governor has been unable to attend to bill signings. 

    State Budget

    As passed by the legislature, the budget includes a 4% Medicaid provider rate increase for behavioral health services, starting July 1, 2020.

    Licensing Board

    • HB 303/SB 182 – State Board of Professional Counselors and Therapists - Sunset Extension and Program Evaluation. This bill extends the Board’s sunset date through July 1, 2026.  In addition, the Board must provide regular updates to the Maryland General Assembly through 2025 on:
    • Addressing the Board’s complaint backlog;
    • Adoption of regulations related to education and experience requirements; and
    • Establishing an Alcohol and Drug Counselor Subcommittee.

    Service Directories

    • HB 332/SB 441 – Mental Health - Confidentiality of Medical Records and Emergency Facilities List. This bill requires the Maryland Department of Health to include in its list of emergency facilities: comprehensive crisis response centers, crisis stabilization centers, crisis treatment centers, and outpatient mental health clinics. The list has historically only included hospitals with emergency departments and is made available an annual basis to health departments, judges, sheriff’s offices, police stations, and Secret Service office in the state.  The revised list will also now be sent to local behavioral health authorities.
    • HB 1121 – Maryland Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Registry and Referral System. This bill establishes a behavioral health services registry and referral system in the Department of Health so health care providers can identify and access available inpatient and outpatient behavioral health services for patients/clients.


    The legislature passed three telehealth bills impacting behavioral health services:

    • HB 448/SB 402 – Health Care Practitioners - Telehealth and Shortage. This bill permits all licensed health care practitioners to provide telehealth services using synchronous and asynchronous technologies according to existing standards of care and applicable laws related to consent, privacy, and prescribing.
    • HB 1208/SB 502 – Telehealth - Mental Health and Chronic Condition Management Services - Coverage and Pilot Program. This bill requires Medicaid to reimburse mental health services provided to a patient in their home.  Currently, Medicaid requires an individual to be in a clinical setting in order for the provider to seek reimbursement.  Medicaid must also study and report by December 1, 2021 on the appropriateness of providing substance use disorder services in a patient’s home.  The bill also requires private insurers who reimburse for telehealth services to provide reimbursement on par with in-person service rates.
    • HB 1663/SB 1080 - State Government - State of Emergency and Catastrophic Health Emergency - Authority of Governor and Unemployment Insurance Benefits (COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Protection Act of 2020). This emergency legislation includes requirements related to COVID-19 for the coverage of services, testing, and telehealth. This includes permitting the Governor to waive existing telehealth requirements for health care providers.  The bill is effective through April 30, 2021.

    Behavioral Health in Schools

    • HB 277/SB 367 – State Department of Education - Guidelines on Trauma-Informed Approach. This bill requires the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) to develop and distribute guidelines to assist schools with implementing comprehensive trauma-informed policies.  MSDE must consult with the Department of Health and the Department of Human Services in developing the guidelines.
    • HB 1300/SB 1000 – Blueprint for Maryland's Future – Implementation. This bill implements recommendations from the Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education, also known as the Kirwan Commission.  The bill includes two funding mechanisms for the provision of behavioral health services:
      • Per Pupil Funding for Wraparound Services: Starting in FY 22, schools with a concentration of poverty between 55% and 100% will receive funding on a sliding scale for wraparound services, including increased access to mental health practitioners and professional development to school staff to provide trauma-informed interventions. 
      • Maryland Consortium on Coordinated Community Supports: This new entity will coordinate community behavioral health supports and services in schools, including providing grants to support services in schools.  Funding will be phased in, beginning in FY 22 at $25 million.  By FY 26, the annual funding allocation will be $125 million a year.
  • Thursday, November 01, 2018 7:08 PM | Anonymous

    By Susan Roistacher LCPC


    1.     In the Maryland General Assembly:

    LCPCM’s lobbyists and Legislative Chair cull through all proposed legislation each year to identify bills that impact our practice and our clients. In 2018, we reviewed almost 80 bills and testified on 15, including bills affecting Medicaid and teletherapy regulations. Most significant this year was our participation in the 10-year Sunset Review of the Board of Professional Counselors and Therapists. The legislative Sunset Review of the Board resulted in 2 years of legislative oversight and 33 mandates for improvements.

    2.     With the Board of Professional Counselors and Therapists (BOPCT):

    LCPCM makes a concerted effort to stay abreast of Board actions and decisions by attending monthly meetings and addressing the Board on specific topics. We provide information and assistance whenever possible. LCPCM shares your requests, complaints, and suggestions for change. This year, we discovered that it is more effective for LCPCM members to contact the Board directly by email, in addition to contacting LCPCM. We encourage you to share your concerns with the Executive Director, Kimberly Link, at: kimberly.link@maryland.gov.  Please be sure to also copy me, Susan Roistacher, Legislative Chair at: roistacher@verizon.net. I want to know your concerns, so we can offer support when needed and can advocate more effectively.  The following is a list of some LCPCM 2017-2018 advocacy projects related to the BOPCT: 

    • Clinical Regulations: LCPCM recently provided the Board with a detailed proposal for creating a separate LCPC chapter in COMAR (DHMD Chapter 58).  The Board is reviewing our proposal and is amendable to working with us. LCPCM studied the LCPC regulations over several years to identify ambiguities, inconsistencies, and specific regulations we believe to be unnecessary impediments to licensure. Several amendments were proposed to the Board in writing. The clinical regulations committee consists of myself, Elaine Johnson PhD, and Katy Schaffer PhD from the University of Baltimore, and Rachael Faulkner. Rachael is one of our lobbyists from Public Policy Partners, who has many years of experience writing regulations and is a regulations expert.
    • Definitions of Direct and Indirect Clinical Hours: LCPCM provided the BOPCT with clarifying language and specific descriptions for “supervised clinical service hours”. Our suggestions were added to the website instructions for applicants and supervisors. This was a previously ambiguous area that for years caused inconsistencies and confusion in our field.
    • Supervisor Training Requirement: This year, the BOPCT announced the implementation of a previously unenforced and generally unknown regulation that requires all supervisors of LGPCs (including other mental health clinicians) to have supervision training, to apply to the Board for approval, and to pay a fee. We shared information about the community’s confusion regarding this change and made several requests, including a reduction of the $200 application fee. LCPCM suggested ways for the Board to improve its communication and implementation process overall. LCPCM also alerted the Board that the non-LCPC supervisor application form in use failed to screen for the training that was being required for approval, thereby exacerbating the confusion.

    3.     On state healthcare regulation and planning workgroups:

    As representatives of LCPCM, our members and lobbyists monitor and participate on interagency state committees, public advocacy groups and behavioral health coalitions. These groups generate new ideas for legislation and regulations that effect mental health treatment services in Maryland. For example, member Angela Mazer, LCPC serves on the Children’s Behavioral Health Coalition (CBHC). The Children’s Behavioral Health Coalition (CBHC) brings together a range of advocacy groups with a focus on policy issues and concerns specific to children and youth with behavioral health needs and has produced a 2019 Legislative Agenda. Other groups include the MD Health Insurance Protection Commission (Robyn Elliot, lobbyist) and monitoring the MD Medicaid Advisory Committee (Rachel Faulkner, lobbyist).         

    4.     With National organizations:

    • LCPCM members are part of a multistate network of colleagues that write joint letters and proposals supporting or opposing positions taken by national groups such as the American Counseling Association (ACA), the American Mental Health Counselors Association (AMHCA), the Department of Defense, and the Veterans Administration. This Network is united by the belief that a CACREP- only avenue to clinical professional counselor licensure is detrimental to the profession. This year, the Virginia Board of Professional Counselors and Virginia Governor’s office have been a special focus of attention. Larry Epp, LCPC, PhD and Elaine Johnson, PhD co-lead this effort on behalf of LCPCM.
    • LCPCM representatives attend and participate in national professional meetings and conferences. This year, Hillary Alexander, LCPC and Elaine Johnson, PhD attended the AMHCA Leadership Conference in Orlando and reported back to the LCPCM Board.


    (Recent highlights-10/29/2018)

    1.     The LGPC Committee: LCPCM formed a LGPC committee co-chaired by members Robert Castle LCPC and Katy Schaffer PhD. It is creating a guidebook designed to help LGPCs navigate the often confusing and somewhat arduous road to licensure. The guide should be available this Fall. The committee members are LGPCs who provide valuable information to LCPCM, to better serve their needs.

    2.     Conferences: We offer two full-day conferences a year for CEU’s at a discounted for members. LCPCM works hard to contract with well-known professionals who can provide informative and stimulating trainings. Our networking luncheons are included as a special benefit to our members who continue to support all the work we do. 

    3.     Supervisor Trainings: LCPCM is the main provider of supervisor training for LCPCs and others in Maryland. This 18- hour CEU training is offered 3-4 times a year and fulfills the training requirement for clinicians to be approved by the BOPCT. Marsha Riggio, LPC, PhD teaches the training and consistently gets rave reviews.

    4.     Committed Professionals: Once an all-volunteer association, today LCPCM has a professional lobbying group (Public Policy Partners) and a webmaster (Debbie Hastings-DesignMe Creative). We also have a business administrator, Sharon Nalley, who has been with us for a year. She is an experienced financial bookkeeper who can professionally handle our increasing volume of diverse activities including registrations and CEU certificates.

    5.     Supervisor/Supervisee Connection: The LCPCM website has an on-line service to help LGPCs find the supervisor who best meets their needs.  It has information about the prospective supervisor’s background, experience, and specialties. The BOPCT’s website lists approved supervisors, but only provides contact information. This service is the brainchild of Robert Castle, LCPC, PhD who designed and implemented the project.

    6.     BOPCT Nominations: LCPCM nominates members to serve on the BOPCT and submits them to the Governor’s office. We are pleased that over the years, many of our members have been selected and served.

    7.     Parity: Professional parity is an LCPCM priority. We work toward parity legislatively, but also in the community. If requested, LCPCM will assist members confronted with workplace discrimination based on the LCPC title. Members are encouraged to contact us if you need support or intervention on your behalf.

  • Monday, January 15, 2018 6:10 PM | Anonymous

    LCPCM and National Association of Social Workers-Maryland Chapter have joined together to introduce a bill this session of the Maryland General Assembly that would require Medicaid to reimburse Medicaid behavioral health providers for what will be called “telehealth” services. Senator Kathleen Klausmeier will sponsor the bill in the Senate and Delegate Sheree Sample-Hughes will sponsor the bill in the House of Delegates.

  • Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:11 PM | Anonymous

    Use the link below to view the PowerPoint presentation from the LCPCM Legislative Seminar held on 5/9/17.


  • Saturday, May 07, 2016 8:12 PM | Anonymous

    Bill Summary

    HB 245 (SB 310) Support

    Child Abuse and Neglect - Failure to Report

    Del. Kathleen Dumais et al.

    HB 579 (SB 858) Support

    Mental Health - Wraparound Services for Children and Youth

    Del. Samuel Rosenberg et al.

    HB 595 (SB 497) Support

    Behavioral Health Community Providers - Keep the Door Open Act

    Del. Antonio Hayes et al.

    HB 682 (SB 551) Support

    Department of Health and Mental Hygiene - Clinical Crisis Walk-In Services and Mobile Crisis Teams - Strategic Plan

    Del. Samuel Rosenberg et al.

    HB 802 Support with Amendments

    Health Insurance - Provider Panel Lists

    Chair, Health and Government Operations Committee et al.

    HB 944 Oppose

    Criminal Law - Professional Counselors and Therapists - Misconduct (Lynette's Law)

    Del. David Vogt et al.

    HB 984 (SB 17) Support

    Open Meetings Act - Retention of Minutes and Recordings - Revision

    Del. Sid Saab et al.

    HB 1103 Support with Amendments

    Health Care Practitioners - Use of Teletherapy

    Del. Kirill Reznik et al.

    HB1217 (SB899) Support with Amendments

    Maryland Medical Assistance Program-specialty mental health

    HB 1318 (SB929) -Support

    Network Access Standards and Provider Network Directories

    HB 1437 – Support

    Education- Individualized Counseling Services-Requirements

    HB 334 – Support with Amendments

    Access to accurate provider directories

  • Monday, February 08, 2016 6:13 PM | Anonymous

    Thus far, LCPCM is supporting the following two bills in the Maryland General Assembly and urge you to contact your Delegates and Senators to do the same. You can find the information you need to make these contacts by going to the Maryland General Assembly website (http://mgaleg.maryland.gov)

    1. The Keep the Door Open Act (SB 497 / HB 595), will improve access to care by ensuring that our community behavioral health providers have the resources necessary to treat those in need. The Senate bill was introduced with 27 co-sponsors and is scheduled for a hearing later this month. The House bill will be heard in the Health and Government Operations Committee next week!

    2. These bills that were introduced last week (SB 551 / HB 682) will require the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene to work with other stakeholders in developing a plan to ensure that walk-in and mobile behavioral health crisis services are available to Marylanders across the state. This walk-in capacity is critical. In places that have implemented highly efficient crisis response systems – both in Maryland and throughout the United States – a central hub, operating 24/7, where individuals in crisis and their families can go without an appointment, is a key to success.

  • Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:14 PM | Anonymous

    Dear Maryland Mental Health Counselor Community:

    I know that I have bombarded you with pleas and special requests this summer, but this one is my most impassioned plea to you for assistance.

    Contrary to what any of us would believe was possible, we now have sister groups of mental health counselors sympathetic to the CACREP only perspective, in different parts of the country, lobbying members of Congress to deny mental health counselors who graduated from non-CACREP and counseling psychology programs (with five years experience) the automatic right to practice in TRICARE, as proposed in a revision to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

    As you can imagine this is a very concerning development, as it gives the false impression that concerned mental health counselors are decrying the practice of unqualified mental counselors, who are identified by their graduation from "unaccredited" or non-CACREP schools. I confess that it is surreal and disconcerting to read these communications to Congress and to see counselors trying to undermine the careers and livelihoods of their fellow counselors. Nothing can be more distressing to witness than this.

    Many of these commentators are trying to spin the false narrative that allowing non-CACREP counselors to practice in TRICARE will prevent all counselors from ever practicing in MEDICARE. There is no connection between TRICARE and MEDICARE in current bills before Congress and to suggest this connection is misinformation.

    I need every non-CACREP counselor in Maryland to write a short email through the following link (that contacts the entire Maryland Congressional delegation) in order to explain your exceptional competence as a mental health counselor from a non-CACREP school and to ask our Maryland representatives to support the revision in the NDAA that gives all mental health counselors with 5 years experience the right to practice in TRICARE. If you write a sentence, a few sentences, or a paragraph, your email will make a difference, however short or long.

    I wish I had the wisdom to explain to you why our sister associations are trying to harm us rather than reaching out in support. However, I believe our kindness and respectful advocacy will inevitably win out over the hurtful behavior that is being directed against us. I believe our greatest enemy is not those who attack us but the indifference of the overwhelming majority who know what is happening is wrong and choose to do nothing. If every counselor in Maryland stands up for what is right, we will prevail against this undeserved threat to our practice rights and mischaracterization of our competency.

    Please take a moment to voice your opinion to the Maryland Delegation in Congress by sending your email to the link below:

    The distribution list address is:


    This is being sent to:

    Jean Doyle - Legislative Director for The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski

    Tommy Bredar - Legislative Correspondent for The Honorable Benjamin L. Cardin

    Priscilla Ross - Legislative Director for The Honorable Benjamin L. Cardin

    Jodi Schwartz - Legislative Assistant for The Honorable Benjamin L. Cardin

    John Dutton - Legislative Director for The Honorable Andrew P. Harris

    Walter Gonzales - Legislative Director for The Honorable C.A. Ruppersberger

    Raymond O'Mara - Legislative Director for The Honorable John P. Sarbanes

    Christopher Schloesser - Legislative Director for The Honorable Donna Edwards

    Jim Notter - Legislative Director for The Honorable Steny H. Hoyer

    Suzanne Owen - Legislative Director for The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings

    Sarah Schenning- Legislative Director for The Honorable Christopher Van Hollen

    Xan Fishman - Legislative Director for The Honorable John Delaney

    McKenzie Haynes - Military LA for The Honorable John Delaney

    Thank you again for your assistance.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 

LCPCM | P.O. Box 7762, Wilmington, NC 28406  • 443-370-1255 • mylcpcm@gmail.com

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software